论文部分内容阅读
在现代文化与文学史反思与重构中 ,有人将钱钟书与鲁迅相提并论 ,甚至评价超过鲁迅。对此有不少人极力反对。本文认为 ,钱、鲁不属同一领域 ,但都为中国现代文化转型作出了贡献。尺有所短 ,寸有所长。二人均存在一定不足。既然重构 ,可各抒己见。不必判定铁论 ,最好还是由历史进一步沉淀。但笔者坚信 ,鲁迅是经得起历史沉淀的 ,钱钟书的学术建构也应给予充分肯定 ,主张不必争执二人高低 ,而应做深入的研究、探讨工作
In the rethinking and reconstruction of the history of modern culture and literature, some people compare Qian Zhongshu with Lu Xun and even evaluate Lu Xun. Many people strongly oppose this. This paper argues that Qian and Lu belong to the same area, but all contribute to the transformation of modern Chinese culture. Everyone has his strong and weak points. Both have a certain lack of both. Since reconstruction, can express their views. Do not have to decide on iron, it is best to further precipitate from history. However, I firmly believe that Lu Xun is able to withstand the historical precipitation. Qian Zhongshu’s academic construction should also be fully affirmed, not advocating the dispute between the two levels, but should do in-depth study to explore the work