论文部分内容阅读
利用影响力受贿罪是《刑法修正案(七)》第十三条修正增加的,使贪污贿赂犯罪的法网进一步完善,在一定程度上体现了我国的反腐决心。但在具体适用该罪名司法实践中分歧较多,理论指导薄弱,导致各地司法人员诸多困惑,实有必要论述厘清。本文立足于司法实践,从影响力内涵、有无的判断标准、不正当利益的重新分析界定罪名概念;分析犯罪构成,利用冲突原则解决近亲属、关系密切人外延范围,用身份犯原理解决利用非国家工作人员影响力时具有国家工作人员身份如何区别定罪;从认识要素与意志要素方面解决主观故意;解决相关行为以及既遂、未遂、与易混淆其他罪的区别司法定性。具有应用指导意义。
The crime of accepting bribes by influence is the addition of Article 13 of the Amendment to the Criminal Law (VII), which further improves the legal system of corruption and bribery crimes and to some extent reflects our anti-corruption determination. However, there are many differences in judicial practice that specifically apply this offense, and the theoretical guidance is weak, leading to many confusion among judicial personnel all over the country. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify and clarify. Based on the judicial practice, this article defines the conceptions of crimes from the re-analysis of influence connotation, whether there is a criterion or not, analyzes the constitution of crimes, uses the principle of conflict to resolve the extension range of close relatives and close people, How non-state staff members have the distinction of conviction when they have an influence; to resolve subjective intent from the point of cognitive and volitional factors; to resolve related acts and to establish the distinction between successful, attempted and confusing other crimes. It has practical significance.