论文部分内容阅读
近日,广东省东莞市王女士通过网络搜索引擎搜索机票退票电话,而排名靠前的“全国统一退票电话”竟是网络诈骗电话,先后被骗走了近50万元。惨遭损失的王女士认为搜索引擎运营公司具有不可推卸的责任,经协商无果将其告上法庭。搜索引擎公司却大呼冤枉,认为自己不应承担诈骗犯罪分子造成的损失。那么,搜索引擎公司要不要为虚假信息负法律责任?其行为性质应当如何界定?诉讼根源基于网络用户与搜索引擎服务商
Recently, Ms. Wang from Dongguan City, Guangdong Province, searched the internet through a search engine to search for the ticket refund phone, while the top ranking “Uniform Refund Phone” was actually an internet fraud phone and was cheated nearly 500,000 yuan. Ms. Wang, the tragic loss, believes search engine operating companies have an unshirkable responsibility and will be brought to court without any negotiation. Search engine companies shouted innocent, thinking they should not bear the losses caused by fraud criminals. So, search engine companies should not be responsible for the fake information? How to define the nature of their behavior? The root causes of litigation based on network users and search engine service providers