论文部分内容阅读
“窃书不能算偷……窃书!……读书人的事,能算偷么？”这是鲁迅笔下孔乙己的一段狡辩。把孔乙己的这段狡辩安在今天的个别专家,学者身上是再贴切不过了。因为,他们不仅在文章中大段大段地抄袭他人文章,而且至今还在百般抵赖。 2月27日,教育部新闻发言人称,今后将健全学术评价机制和监督制约机制, 目前正在酝酿成立学风建设委员会,要
“Stealing books can not be regarded as stealing ... stealing book ... ... scholarly things, can be regarded as stolen?” This is Lu Xun's account of Kong Yiji has a quibble. It is fitting that this exquisite sophistry by Kong Yi-chi be relied on by today's individual experts and scholars. Because they not only copied a large section of articles in other articles, but so far they are still being denied. On February 27, a spokesman for the Ministry of Education said that in the future, a sound academic evaluation mechanism and a mechanism for supervision and control will be perfected. Currently, a school-building committee is under discussion to