论文部分内容阅读
目的观察分析两种不同类型的侵袭性牙周炎牙周基础治疗的临床效果。方法将2014年9月至2015年9月于我院接受牙周基础治疗的60例侵袭性牙周炎患者选取为观察研究的对象,并按其中侵袭性牙周炎的类型均分为两组(局限组和广泛组),观察比较两组患者治疗前后的牙周参数情况——探诊深度、临床附着丧失、出血指数。结果局限组患者治疗后的探诊深度(1.50±0.38)mm、临床附着丧失(2.11±1.05)mm、出血指数(0.83±0.30)与广泛组患者治疗后的探诊深度(1.15±0.25)mm、临床附着丧失(1.28±1.25)mm、出血指数(0.86±0.23)均得到明显的改善,且均较治疗前的比较差异大(P<0.05),具有统计学意义。结论牙周基础治疗对于不同类型的侵袭性牙周炎均具有显著的疗效,值得临床做进一步推广。
Objective To observe and analyze the clinical effects of two different types of periodontal treatment of periodontitis. Methods Sixty patients with aggressive periodontitis received basic periodontal treatment in our hospital from September 2014 to September 2015 were enrolled in this study. The types of aggressive periodontitis were divided into two groups (Limited group and extensive group). The periodontal parameters before and after treatment were observed and compared between the two groups - depth of exploration, clinical attachment loss and bleeding index. Results In the limited group, the exploration depth (1.50 ± 0.38) mm, clinical attachment loss (2.11 ± 1.05) mm, hemorrhage index (0.83 ± 0.30) and extensive group (1.15 ± 0.25) mm after treatment , Clinical attachment loss (1.28 ± 1.25) mm, bleeding index (0.86 ± 0.23) were significantly improved, and compared with before treatment, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05), with statistical significance. Conclusion The basic periodontal treatment has significant curative effect on different types of aggressive periodontitis, which is worth further promotion in clinic.