目的对比舒普深与头孢哌酮治疗小儿肺炎的临床疗效。方法 64例小儿肺炎患儿,随机分为治疗组与对照组,各32例。治疗组患儿给予舒普深进行治疗,对照组患儿给予头孢哌酮治疗,对比两组的临床疗效。结果治疗组总有效率为96.9%,对照组总有效率为81.3%,治疗组疗效明显优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗组症状及体征改善情况明显优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论舒普深与头孢哌酮治疗小儿肺炎相比,舒普深的临床效果快,患儿症状、体征改善情况也优于头孢哌酮。 Objective To compare the clinical effects of Shu Pu Shen and cefoperazone in the treatment of children with pneumonia. Methods 64 cases of children with pneumonia were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, 32 cases each. Patients in the treatment group were treated with Shu Pu Shen, patients in the control group were treated with cefoperazone, and the clinical efficacy was compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate was 96.9% in the treatment group and 81.3% in the control group. The curative effect in the treatment group was significantly better than that in the control group (P <0.05). The symptoms and signs in the treatment group were better than those in the control group Group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Shu Pushen compared with cefoperazone treatment of children with pneumonia, Shu deep deep clinical results, children with symptoms and signs of improvement than cefoperazone.