论文部分内容阅读
2014年10月16日,最高人民法院对奇虎公司诉腾讯公司垄断纠纷上诉案作出终审判决(以下简称“判决”),驳回上诉,维持原判,认定腾讯不构成垄断侵权。这是自2008年《中华人民共和国反垄断法》(以下简称“反垄断法”)实施以来,最高人民法院审理判决的第一起垄断案件。判决对于反垄断法的理论和实践都具有重要的意义,并对今后反垄断法的实施有诸多启示。一、判决在国内外反垄断法领域的影响本案作为“3Q大战”系列诉讼中最后、也是最重要的一
On October 16, 2014, Supreme People’s Court made a final judgment (hereinafter referred to as the “judgment”) on the case of Qihu Company v. Tencent’s monopoly dispute, upheld the original verdict and held that Tencent does not constitute a monopoly of infringement. This is the first monopoly case that the Supreme People’s Court heard the verdicts since the implementation of the “Anti-monopoly Law of the People’s Republic of China” (hereinafter referred to as the “Anti-monopoly Law”) in 2008. The judgments are of great significance to the theory and practice of antitrust law and give some enlightenment to the implementation of antitrust law in the future. First, the ruling in the field of domestic and foreign anti-monopoly law The case as the “3Q World War ” series of litigation in the last, but also the most important one