论文部分内容阅读
“积极失误”与“消极失误”是各国反垄断法在实施过程中客观上无法避免出现的施法失误,但二者在市场影响、可补救性、风险概率、集中领域等重要内容上是有所差异的。通过比较分析,可以得出如下结论:反垄断法实施中的“消极失误”在市场影响、风险概率上通常都要比“积极失误”大,但是前者的可补救性原则上要比后者高得多;“积极失误”比较容易出现在纵向垄断协议的法律适用中,而“消极失误”在横向垄断协议、滥用市场支配地位、经营者集中的法律适用中都比较容易出现,技术创新市场、自然垄断行业分别是“积极失误”、“消极失误”发生的重灾区代表。
The “positive errors” and “negative errors” are the errors that can not be avoided objectively in the antitrust laws of each country, but the important contents such as market influence, remedy, probability of risk, concentration area and so on There are differences on the. Through comparative analysis, we can draw the following conclusions: “Negative Failure ” in the implementation of antitrust law is usually larger than “positive error ” in the market influence and risk probability, but the former can be remedied in principle Is much higher than the latter; “positive mistakes ” more likely to appear in the application of the law of vertical monopoly agreement, and “negative mistakes ” in the horizontal monopoly agreement, the abuse of market dominance, It is easy to appear that the market for technological innovation and the natural monopoly industries are respectively representatives of the hardest-hit areas in which “positive mistakes” and “negative mistakes” occur.