在目前火爆的公务员录用考试中,结构化面试阶段有必须准备的一类题目:当上级领导的意见与你按照有关规定提出的工作意见不一致时,你该怎么办?从行政伦理学的角度看,这就涉及到该学科关注的一个重要课题:在一个不道德的组织环境中,或面对一个不道德的上级,自己的角色和责任如何定位和担当?尽管多如牛毛的公考培训机构已经整理出了堪称完美、滴水不漏的答案,但在现实工作中,这并不是一个可以轻松面对的问题。其实,自有官僚政治体制以来,这始终是一个很纠结的问题。从理论上说,公共行政人员只需要对权力来源负责,但权力来源往往是终极性的,与具体的行为人相距甚远。如封建专制社会中,一切行政权皆是皇权的派生, In the current popular civil service recruitment examination, structured interview phase has to prepare a class of questions: When the views of the superiors and your work in accordance with the relevant provisions of the opinions do not agree, how to do? From the perspective of administrative ethics , Which involves an important issue that the subject focuses on: how to position and play roles and responsibilities in an unethical organizational environment or in the face of an immoral superiors? Despite the booming public exam training organization has been organized Out of the perfect, drip answer, but in reality, this is not an easy problem to face. In fact, since its own bureaucratic system, this has always been a very tangled issue. In theory, public administrators need only be responsible for the source of power, but the source of power is often the ultimate, far from specific actors. Such as feudal autocratic society, all the administrative power is derived from the imperial power,