论文部分内容阅读
目次引言一、对近代民法上物权法定主义的检讨二、“物权法定”基本原则地位的弱化三、物权法定下物权自治如何可能四、物权法定的制度定位(代结论)引言传统民法著述中,物权法定主义被认为是物权法当然的一项基本原则。~([1])在立法上,《日本民法典》第175条、《韩国民法典》第185条、我国台湾地区现行“民法”第757条更是在民法典中明文规定了物权法定主义。《中华人民共和国物权法》
I. INTRODUCTION I. Review of Jurisprudence of Real Right in Modern Civil Law II. Weakening of the Basic Principle of Jus Reality 3. How Possibility of Real Right Autonomy Under the Jurisprudence of Real Right IV. Institutional Positioning of Juristic Right of Real Right (on behalf of the Conclusion) Introduction The traditional civil law In the writings, the legal doctrine of real rights is considered as a basic principle of the law of property. In the legislation, Article 175 of the Civil Code of Japan, Article 185 of the Korean Civil Code, and Article 757 of the current Civil Code in Taiwan of our country also specify the Property Law Definitive. “People’s Republic of China Property Law”