论文部分内容阅读
一比较——一个古老的批评方法比较的方法,在中国史学上,不论是关于历史的比较,还是关于史学的比较,都有长久的渊源和广泛的运用。从史学批评来看,也是如此。《隋书·经籍志》经部著录的不著撰人之《春秋公羊谷梁二传评》3卷,魏大长秋韩益撰《春秋三传论》10卷,东晋博士胡讷撰《春秋三传评》10卷。这些,可能是较早而又较系统地通过比较对“三传”(《左氏传》、《公羊传》、《谷梁传》)进行评论的著作。从《晋书·礼志中》和《礼志下》三处记胡讷的言论来看,他的《春秋三传评》,当是着
A comparison - an ancient method of comparison of methods of criticism, has a long history of origin and extensive application in Chinese historiography, both in history and in history. From the historical criticism, the same is true. “Sui Shu Jing Ji Zhi” recorded by the Ministry of the Ministry of the author, “Spring and Autumn ram Gu Liang two biography” 3 volumes, Wei Chang Chang Qiu Han Yi’s “Spring and Autumn Biography” 10 volumes, Three Biography “10 volumes. These may be the earliest and more systematic comparisons of the Three Kingdoms (Zuo Zhuan, Ramsong, Gu Liang Chuan). Judging from his comments on ”Three Books in Jin Shu Etiquette“ and ”The Book of Rites“, his ”Three Comments on Chun Qiu"