为了拯救传统的经验论,蒯因站在自然主义的立场,把认识论自然化,将逻辑实证主义与实用主义相结合,继续发展经验论的事业。但是,有的哲学家对蒯因为自然化认识论设计的路线不以为然,例如,肯定地说,罗蒂认为,蒯因的认识论应该走相对主义的路线;否定地说,里勒认为,蒯因的认识论不应该坚持心理主义的路线。无论哪种评价,都存在着对蒯因自然化认识论要旨的严重误解。 In order to save the traditional empiricism, 蒯 because of standing on the position of naturalism, the naturalization of epistemology, the combination of logical positivism and pragmatism, continue to develop the cause of empiricism. However, some philosophers disagree with the line of naturalistic epistemology. For example, Rorty, to be sure, says that Epistemology of Gene should follow the relativistic line. In a negative sense, Lehler believes that Epitaph’s epistemology We should not insist on the psychological route. No matter what kind of evaluation, there is a serious misunderstanding about the essence of Epistemology of naturalization.