论文部分内容阅读
目的观察并对比分析应用不同疗法治疗妇产科宫颈糜烂的临床疗效。方法 129例宫颈糜烂患者随机分为试验组与对照组A、对照组B,各43例。对照组A行波姆红外线治疗;对照组B行微波治疗;试验组行射频自凝刀治疗。对比三种疗法的临床疗效、术后并发症和术后6个月复发率。结果经三组不同疗法治疗,试验组总有效率93.0%显著优于对照组A 76.7%和对照组B 74.4%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组术后并发症及术后6个月的复发情况明显低于其他两组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用射频自凝刀治疗宫颈糜烂,其临床疗效、术后并发症和6个月复发情况更为优异,应广泛推广。
Objective To observe and compare the clinical effects of applying different therapies to treat cervical erosion in obstetrics and gynecology. Methods 129 patients with cervical erosion were randomly divided into experimental group and control group A, control group B, each 43 cases. The control group A line of breast infrared treatment; control group B microwave treatment; experimental group RF self coagulation knife treatment. The clinical efficacy, postoperative complications and recurrence rate after 6 months were compared between the three treatments. Results After three groups of different therapies, the total effective rate was 93.0% in the experimental group, which was significantly better than 76.7% in the control group and 74.4% in the control group (P <0.05). The postoperative complication and operation of the experimental group After 6 months of recurrence was significantly lower than the other two groups, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion The use of RF coagulation knife in the treatment of cervical erosion, the clinical efficacy, postoperative complications and recurrence of 6 months more excellent, should be widely promoted.