论文部分内容阅读
这可能是不正确的,正如Sebok所指出的那样,惩罚性赔偿赔偿在美国早期的侵权法中主要是补偿性的功能,如美国最高法院在Cooper Industries Inc案中所宣传的……首先,惩罚性赔偿的基础是对特定民事权利的侵害,此民事权利有别于完全被补偿性赔偿所纠正的民事权利体系。运用这一原则到我们的问题,我们得出如下结论:即使有很强的证据对被告人实施制裁,如果原告没有受到相应的损害,也没有对被告提出不当得利请求,那么这些证据不能单独证明原告有优势。……撇开惩罚性赔偿与私法的基本原则的不一致的事实,其也显示出一些另外的缺陷。……Colby称之为“总的损害”的惩罚性赔偿金:有可能一些受害者将获得旨在惩罚不法行为的整个计划的惩罚性损害赔偿金,从而导致不公正处罚的累积……一些欧洲的法律制度允许某些团体代表受害者的利益进行禁止令的申请和补偿的请求。
This may not be true, as Sebok points out, punitive damages are primarily compensatory in early tort law in the United States, as the Supreme Court of the United States proclaimed in Cooper Industries Inc. ... First of all, punishment The basis of sexual damages is the infringement of specific civil rights, which is different from the civil rights system that is completely corrected by compensatory damages. Using this principle to our question, we come to the following conclusion: Even if there is strong evidence to impose sanctions on the defendant, if the plaintiff did not suffer the corresponding damage and did not make the improper profit-making claim against the defendant, then the evidence can not be used alone Proved the plaintiff has the advantage. Leaving aside the inconsistency between the principle of punitive damages and the basic principle of private law, it also shows some additional defects. ... What Colby calls a “total damage” punitive damages: It is possible that some victims will receive punitive damages for the entire scheme designed to punish unlawful acts, leading to the accumulation of unjust punishments ... Some European legal systems allow certain groups to apply for injunctions and requests for compensation in the interests of the victims.