论文部分内容阅读
在20世纪晚期,秉守“捍卫作者”立场的理论家E.D.赫施曾不无伤感地指出:自T·S·艾略特的文学批评活动开始,“一切文学作品都是独立于这种主观世界(作家个人的心灵、思想与情感)而存在的,这一点成为不容辩驳的事实”1。就整体来看,这一说法鲜明呈现了文学语言批评对于作者及其在文学活动中形象与地位的总体态度。不过,在如何认识这一历史变更的关键层面,却又存在着莫衷一是的种种说法。而这又直接影响了人们对当代文论
In the late 20th century, ED Herch, a theoretician who adhered to the position of “defending the author,” once pointed out without hesitation: since the literary criticism of TS Eliot, “all literary works are independent of This subjective world (the writer’s personal mind, thoughts and emotions) exists as an indisputable fact. ” On the whole, this view clearly shows the general attitude of literary language criticism to the author and his image and position in literary activities. However, at a crucial level of how to recognize this historical change, there are still many different explanations. And this directly affects people’s contemporary literary theory