我国的内地、香港、澳门和台湾地区分别处于不同的法域，环境污染侵权法有相当的差异，而跨区环境污染问题是很难避免的，对污染危害之后的损害赔偿争议的处理，不管是调解、仲裁或者司法途径，都会涉及区际环境民事法律冲突问题，需要运用适当的规则加以解决。本文对各法域的环境污染侵权法的各个领域进行了比较，包括环境污染侵权行为的概念、侵权责任的成立、责任的形式、诉讼时效、举证责任等，并对如何解决环境污染侵权法的冲突进行了初步探讨 China’s Mainland, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan are in different jurisdictions, and there are considerable differences in TIA laws. However, cross-boundary environmental pollution problems are very difficult to avoid. Disputes over the damages after pollution hazards are dealt with no matter Mediation, arbitration or judicial channels will involve the conflict of laws and regulations in the interregional environment and will need to be solved by appropriate rules. This article compares the various fields of environmental pollution tort law in different jurisdictions, including the concept of environmental pollution infringement, the establishment of tort liability, the form of responsibility, the limitation of action, the burden of proof and so on. And how to resolve the conflicts of environmental pollution tort law Conducted a preliminary discussion