论文部分内容阅读
知识产权是法律赋予的一种合法垄断权,但一旦被滥用,则可能产生排除、限制竞争后果,构成垄断行为。滥用知识产权垄断行为虽然有多种表现形式,但不是一种独立的垄断行为类型,而是分别归于垄断协议、滥用市场支配地位或是经营者集中,因此反垄断行为认定通常遵循本身违法原则和合理分析原则,也同样适用于滥用知识产权垄断行为的具体认定。在知识产权领域的反垄断规制中,合理分析原则的应用范围较本身违法原则更广,居于更为重要的地位,具有一般原则的性质。目前,美国、欧盟、日本等国家都颁布和制定了有关知识产权垄断的指南或规章,并以本身违法原则和合理分析原则为基础,采取或遵循一种分类规制的原则思路对滥用知识产权垄断行为的认定作出细化规定。我国《反垄断法》第五十五条关于知识产权垄断行为的规定较为原则,极有必要借鉴其他国家和地区的先行做法,研究制订专门的、确定性较高的执法指南或者规则,并将分类规制的思路和方法引入滥用知识产权垄断行为的规制体系。
Intellectual property is a legal monopoly granted by law, but once abused, it may result in exclusion and limit the consequences of competition, thus constituting a monopoly. Although there are many manifestations of abuse of intellectual property, monopolistic behavior is not an independent type of monopoly behavior, but rather monopoly agreements, abuse of market dominance, or concentration of operators. Therefore, the determination of antitrust acts generally follows its own principles of illegality and The principle of rational analysis is also applicable to the specific identification of the abuse of intellectual property monopoly. In the field of intellectual property antitrust regulation, the scope of the application of the principle of reasonable analysis is broader than its own principle of illegality, living in a more important position and of a general principle. At present, the United States, the European Union, Japan and other countries have promulgated and formulated guidelines or regulations on monopoly of intellectual property. Based on their own principles of illegality and principles of rational analysis, they adopt or follow a principle of classification and regulation to monopolize the abuse of intellectual property Determination of behavior to make detailed provisions. Article 55 of the “Anti-monopoly Law” of our country stipulates more specifically the monopoly behavior of intellectual property. It is very necessary to learn from the precedent practices of other countries and regions to study and formulate specific and definite law enforcement guidelines or rules. The ideas and methods of classification regulation introduce the regulation system of abuse of intellectual property monopoly.