论文部分内容阅读
读《水浒》,不可忽略最后一回即二百二十回关于宋江结局的描写。毛主席指出:“《水浒》这部书,好就好在投降。做反面教材,使人民都知道投降派。”宋江就是投降派的一面镜子。而《水浒》的作者歌颂和美化宋江,在最后一回可以说达到了登峰造极的地步。它是作者寓意深长的呕心之作,也是这部宣扬投降主义的反面教材的重要组成部分。可是,有的评论者却为《水浒》的结局描写叫好,认为它是“对封建统治阶级的有力控诉”,也是“对宋江投降主义路线的有力批判”。事实果真是这样吗?
Reading “Water Margin”, can not be ignored that the last one that back two hundred and twenty back on the description of the ending of Song Jiang. Chairman Mao pointed out: “The book” Water Margin “is good enough to surrender, so as to make the people know about the capitulationists.” Song Jiang is a mirror of the capitulationists. The “Water Margin” songwriter and beautification of Song Jiang, in the last one can be said reached the peak. It is a profound and painstaking work by the author and an important part of the negative teaching that promotes surrender. However, some commenters applaud the outcome of Water Margin as “a powerful complaint against the feudal ruling class” and “a powerful criticism of Song Jiang’s capitulationist line.” Is this really the case?