论文部分内容阅读
荀子关于“王霸之辨”的理解,至少有三方面的推进:其一,扬弃了孟子“王”“霸”对峙的二元模式,代之以“王”“霸”“权谋”的三分格局,为化“霸”入“王”提供了价值可能。其二,打破了只从“君”“民”两维论说“王”“霸”之别的固有思维,充分重视“能臣贤相”的政治作用与历史意义,为化“霸”入“王”提供了主体担保。其三,建构了价值理性与工具理性统一的儒“术”新范式,既视“术”为德性的外在显现,又将其与灵活应变的政治能力相联系,为化“霸”入“王”提供了行动指南。荀子“王霸”观既与孔孟一脉相承,又有不同历史境遇下的新开展;后者在丰富理论的同时,也埋下异化的隐患。
Xunzi’s understanding of “the discrimination of the hegemony” has at least three aspects: First, the dual mode of confrontation of Mencius, “Wang” and “Ba” was abandoned and replaced by “Wang” The three-part pattern of “tyranny” and “conspiracy” provides the possibility of “king” into “king”. Second, we must break away from the inherent thinking of the two-dimensional theory of “king ” and “people ” and give full consideration to the political role of Historical significance, as the “Pa ” into “Wang ” provides the main guarantee. Thirdly, it constructs a new paradigm of Confucianism, which combines the rational rationality and the instrumental unity. It not only considers the external appearance of “technique” as virtue, but also links it with the flexible and flexible political ability. “Pa ” into “Wang ” provides a guide to action. Xunzi “Wang Ba ” view is not only inherited from Confucius and Mencius, but also developed under different historical circumstances; the latter enriches the theory as well as alienating the hidden dangers.