我国公司法上虽引入了忠实义务和勤勉义务的信义义务二分法构造,与忠实义务的规定相比,《公司法》第148条第1款关于勤勉义务规定的过于原则,司法裁判性不强。鉴此,本文以我国公司法有关董事(高管)勤勉义务规定的司法裁判标准确立为题,展开以下论证:第一,立足审判实践的回顾与分析,发现我国《公司法》第148条第1款勤勉义务规定的司法裁判困境,引出明确勤勉 Although the incorporation of faithful duty and diligence obligation in the company law of our country introduced the dichotomy of fiduciary duty, compared with the stipulation of loyalty obligation, the article 148, paragraph 1, of the “Company Law” is too principled about the diligence obligation and the judicial adjudication is not strong . In view of this, this article takes the establishment of the judicial adjudication standard stipulated in the diligence and obligation of the directors (executives) in our company law as the title, and carries out the following arguments: First, based on the review and analysis of the trial practice, it is found that Article 148 1 diligence obligations of the judicial referee dilemma, leads to a clear diligence