《史記·漢興以來將相名臣年表》中有倒書現象,自清代汪越以來,不少學者參與討論,發表了不少意見。總體來說可以分爲兩派,一派認爲倒書有特别的用意,一派認爲没有。但多數學者僅是從傳世文獻入手,更多的是分析倒書文字的内容,或通過分析表的真偽來立論。所得結論,合理不合理的成分均有。自二十世紀初以來,各地陸續出土了大批的秦漢簡牘,有一些簡牘上便寫有倒書。因爲《史記》有很大可能最早是寫在竹簡上的,所以出土文獻中的倒書就爲解開《史記》中的倒書現象提供了新的材料,可以在前人的研究基礎上更進一步,在此之前已有學者利用出土簡牘對倒書問題進行研究,本文的研究旨在發現更多的證據,提出新的可能,爲問題的最終解決作出努力。 Since the Historian Hanxing will phase Chen Ming Chronology, there is a book down phenomenon, since the Qing Dynasty Wang Yue, many scholars participated in the discussion, made a lot of opinions. On the whole, it can be divided into two groups. One group thinks that there is a special intention in the book, and one group does not think it. However, most scholars only start with the handed down documents, analyze more the contents of the written words, or make an argument by analyzing the authenticity of the forms. The conclusions obtained, there are reasonable and unreasonable elements. Since the beginning of the twentieth century, a large number of Qin and Han dynasties have been unearthed in various places, some of which have been written down. Because “Historical Records” is very likely to be written on the bamboo slips at the earliest, the essays in the unearthed documents provide new materials for solving the phenomenon of the book-breaking in the “Records of the Historian” and can be based on previous studies Further, prior to this, some scholars have used the unearthed briefs to study the problem of down-book. The purpose of this paper is to find more evidence, propose new possibilities and make efforts to solve the final problem.