论文部分内容阅读
民國初年,洛陽附近出土漢石經《春秋》殘字,頗異於今本三家之經文,羅振玉、張國淦、馬衡等咸有考證。其考證約有二端,一則推定碑圖格式,二則考釋殘字與今本互異者。漢石經碑圖格式,常例爲行70字,但第二石陽面僖公篇爲行72字,陰面昭公篇爲行7工字。羅、張、馬俱未能揭示,故論斷時有誤差。殘字與今本互異者,主在羡奪,羡奪之推斷,又與《公羊》義例相關。而諸家論及羡奪與《公羊》義例,多可補正。今一一表襮之,終以復原之碑圖,或有裨於《春秋》經文之校勘與《公羊》義例之辨析。
In the early years of the Republic of China, the Han Dynasty unearthed near Luoyang was classified as “Spring and Autumn”, which is quite different from the texts of the present three books, namely Luo Zhenyu, Zhang Guigan and Ma Heng. The textual research has about two ends, one is a presumed tablet format, and the other two are textual and explanatory. Han stone by the tablet map format, 70 cases for the routine line, but the second stone Yang surface of the public section of the line 72 words, the shadow of the public section for the line 7 workers word. Luo, Zhang, Ma are unable to reveal, so there are errors in the judgment. The difference between the remnant and the present, the main envy, envy deduction, but also with the “ram” righteousness related. However, all monarchs enumerated envy and “ram” justice, can be corrected. This one by one on the table, finally to restore the tablet, or for the collation of “Spring and Autumn” scripture and “ram” case analysis.