论文部分内容阅读
目的:研究在瘢痕子宫中期妊娠引产中应用不同引产方法的临床效果。方法:选取2015年1月-2016年1月在我院妇产科收治的瘢痕子宫中期妊娠引产的100例孕妇,按照不同的引产方法将其分成两组,即研究组和对照组,每组各50例。对照组孕妇给予依沙吖啶羊膜腔注射引产,研究组孕妇给予口服米非司酮联合米索前列醇阴道放置引产,观察两种引产方法的临床效果。结果:研究组患者在引产过程中,引产出血量、出现宫缩时间、引出时间等数据相比对照组有明显差异(P<0.05),具有统计学意义,研究组的引产效果优于对照组。结论:在临床瘢痕子宫中期妊娠引产中,使用米非司酮口服联合米索前列醇阴道放置引产效果明显优于依沙吖啶羊膜腔注射,值得临学推广应用。
Objective: To study the clinical effect of different abortion methods in induced abortion of mid-term pregnancy with scar. Methods: A total of 100 pregnant women who were admitted to obstetrics and gynecology department of our hospital from January 2015 to January 2016 were divided into two groups according to different methods of induction of labor: the study group and the control group, each group 50 cases each. Control group of pregnant women given amniotic fluid injection of amniotic fluid induced abortion, the study group of pregnant women given oral mifepristone combined with misoprostol vaginal placement induced labor, observe the clinical effects of two induction methods. Results: There was a significant difference between the study group and the control group in the amount of induced labor, the amount of induced labor, the time of uterine contractions, and the time of withdrawal (P <0.05), which was statistically significant. The induction effect of study group was better than that of the control group . Conclusion: In the clinical pregnancy induced abortion of uterine scar, the use of mifepristone combined with oral misoprostol vaginal discharge induction of labor is significantly better than that of ethacridine amniotic injection, is worth to promote the clinical application.