杜甫的诗歌，向以“诗史”称名于世，特别他安史之乱前后的一系列反映兵连祸结人民苦难的诗歌，无不契合于史实，这是不是说，诗人是否属于史学家名列，我想，这是不会有人苟同的。作为文学的杜甫和作为史学的杜甫，必是前者而非后者。 杜甫的《前出塞》与《后出塞》，向为人们 Du Fu’s poetry, to the “poetic history” was named in the world, especially after his peaceful history of the war before and after the series of soldiers reflect the suffering of the people of the poem, all fit historical facts, is this not to say whether the poet belongs to the historian, I think This is something nobody will agree with. Du Fu, as a literary, and Du Fu, a historian, must be the former rather than the latter. Du Fu’s “before the plug” and “after the plug” to the people