论文部分内容阅读
冯铁金先生于2009年2月18日将他在《上海革命史资料与研究》第7、8辑上发表的《何叔衡是“一大”代表,但未出席“一大”》、《关于何叔衡未出席“一大”考证续补》寄给了我,征求我的见解。本来我不愿将党史界已经肯定的问题多花笔墨,但对来信不答复,似有失礼。一、迷信张国焘的回忆冯先生的观点,是张国焘观点的翻版,其文章是张国焘观点的注释。冯先生说:“何叔衡是‘一大’代表,但未出席‘一大’,张国焘《我的回忆》揭开了谜底。”他引用张国焘的原话:“在大会召开之
On February 18, 2009, Mr. Feng Tiejin put ”He Shuheng,“ a ”big“ representative in the 7th and 8th series of ”Shanghai Revolutionary History Materials and Research“, but did not attend ”a big one.“ ” “On what Shu-Heng did not attend ” a “research renewal” sent to me, for my opinion. Originally, I did not wish to spend more on the issues already affirmed by the party’s history, but it seems rude to refuse to reply. First, the superstition of Mr. Cheung’s memories Mr. Fung’s point of view, is a replica of Zhang Guofan’s point of view, the article is Zhang Guotao point of view of the Notes. Mr. Feng said: “He Shuheng is a representative of” one big, “but did not attend ’one big’. Zhang Guotao’s” My Memories “opened the answer.” He quoted Zhang Guotao’s original remark: "At the conference,