现实生活中,经常会遇到对同一事物、同一现象、同一观念有不同声音的情况。例如,拾金不昧者接受了失钱物者的酬金,是不是不再属于“拾金不昧”?生活中应该无条件地“勇往直前”呢,还是可以“停一停”甚至“退一退”……如果你不同意对方的观点,你就必须摆事实、讲道理批驳对方,若写成文章就是驳论文。初中生写驳论文,常犯的毛病是“靶子”不明确、说理不充分和结构不合理。下面这篇文章在这些方面堪称范例,值得借鉴。“三代内无大学生”是新“出身论”吗? In real life, we often encounter the same thing, the same phenomenon, the same concept of different voices. For example, if the loser accepts the remuneration of the loser, is it no longer a part of her life? Should she unconditionally stay ahead for a long time, or can she stop for a while or even retire? If you do not agree with each other’s point of view, you have to put the facts, reasoning criticize each other, if written article is dismissed. Junior high school students to write dissertations, often a mistake is “target ” is not clear, the argument is not sufficient and the structure is not reasonable. The following article is an example in these areas, it is worth learning. “Three generations of college students ” is the new “origin theory ” it?