笔者近期将清代刻印本李中样著《雷公药性解》一书,与今人王兴法辑佚本《雷公炮炙论》比照参读,再细读《本草品汇精要》等书,似觉《品汇》一书多处割裂前人之作,且疏漏颇多,现浅析为下。如菟丝子、雷公云“凡使勿用天碧草,其样真相似,只是天碧草子味酸涩并粘,不入药用。”而《品汇》在该药赝项下仅注“天碧草子为伪”,其伪品之特征皆废。 The author recently engraved the book of Lei Membrane Sexuality in the book of Li Qingzhong in the Qing Dynasty and compared it with the present Wang Xingfa edition of “The Leigong Artillery Paradox”, and then read the book “The Essence of Herbal Medicine” and so on. The book “Purchasing” has many pieces of previous work, and there are many omissions. For example, dodder seed, Lei Gongyun, “If you don’t use Tiancao grass, it’s really similar, but it’s just sour and sticky. It’s not medicinal.” And “The Collection” only notes “Tian Bi.” The grass is false, and the characteristics of its counterfeit goods are abolished.