论文部分内容阅读
在清初三藩叛乱期间,高奣映承袭的到底是“姚安府土知府”抑或“姚安府土同知”的问题值得引起重视。咸同兵变以后,姚州地方文化精英(如甘雨、甘孟贤、由云龙等)为了重建遭受战争破坏的社会秩序,用“春秋笔法”强硬地将清初投降派代表高奣塑造成为一个符合儒家标准的理想人物,诸如“应召出任四川按察使”“托疾挂冠”等都没有直接证据。毫无疑问,国内学术界过分强调了《高雪君先生家传》(晚清甘孟贤搜集间接证据撰写而成)的史料价值,这是对高奣话题的回避与误解。
During the rebellion in San Qing during the early Qing Dynasty, the issue of Gao Qunying’s succession deserved attention. In the wake of the mutiny, local elites of Yaozhou (such as Gan Yu, Gan Menxian, Yunlong, etc.) used the Spring and Autumn Calligraphy to harden the Gao Qiao, a capitulationist in the early Qing Dynasty, into one in order to rebuild the social order damaged by the war. Ideal figures that conform to Confucian standards, such as “There are no direct evidences of being summoned to Sichuan for inspection, ” and “care and support”. Undoubtedly, the domestic academic circles have overemphasized the historical value of the biography of Mr. Gao Xuejun (compiled by Yin Meng-yin in the late Qing Dynasty for collecting indirect evidence), which is the avoidance and misunderstanding of Gao Zui’s topic.