论文部分内容阅读
文章从社会弱势阶层的视角,采用田野调查法,研究了“撤点并校”政策在“后撤点并校”时代的执行结果。研究发现,“撤点并校”政策以“经济效益”为主导,脱离了政策本真与社会公正,导致其在山区农村被扭曲执行,与此同时,受就近入学原则界定模糊、地方课程“不地方”、教育督导职能缺失等因素的影响,“后撤点并校”时代山区农村小学的布局半径过大,加重了当地小学生的上学负担,严重撕裂了山区农村的社会文化网络,并进一步固化了弱势阶层的社会地位。对此,应从政策执行效益、课程建设及教育督导等方面加以改进,以促进教育均衡,弱化社会分层,保障社会公正。
From the perspective of socially disadvantaged groups, the article uses the field investigation method to study the implementation results of the policy of “withdrawing from school and from school” in the period of “withdrawing from school and from schooling”. The study found that the policy of “withdrawal and school” is dominated by “economic benefits ”, and is out of the realities of policies and social justice, resulting in its being distorted in rural areas of mountainous areas. At the same time, it is ambiguously defined by the principle of near-term admission , Local curriculum “not place ”, lack of education supervision function and other factors, “backward point and school ” era mountain rural primary school layout radius is too large, aggravating the burden of school attendance of local pupils, severely torn Mountainous rural social and cultural networks, and further solidified the disadvantaged social status. In this regard, policy implementation efficiency, curriculum construction and education supervision should be improved in order to promote balanced education, weaken the social stratification and ensure social justice.