论文部分内容阅读
欧阳修、吕夏卿都主张以“春秋笔法”为指导编纂史书,强调儒家伦理对史学编纂的意义,提倡直笔书法,强调记述简要。不过,由于欧、吕对待《春秋》三传的不同态度,使其在“春秋书法”的具体运用上显现出较大的差异:欧阳修主变通,贵创新,凭己意理解经义,注重史论的阐发;吕夏卿主贯通,贵继承,重视“例”的规范,讲究“一字褒贬”。欧、吕作为宋代采用“春秋笔法”的典范,对史学理学化的发展影响很大。
Ouyang Xiu and Lv Xiaqing both advocated the compilation of history books guided by Spring and Autumn Styles, emphasizing the significance of Confucian ethics for the compilation of historiography, advocating direct calligraphy and emphasizing the narration. However, due to the different attitudes of Lu and Lu in treatise of “Spring and Autumn”, it makes a big difference in the concrete application of “Spring Calligraphy”: Ouyang Xiuzhu, Pay attention to the elucidation of the history theory; Lv Xia Qing master through, you inherit, pay attention to “example ” norms, pay attention to “the word praise and derogatory ”. Europe and Lu used as models of “Spring and Autumn Styles” in the Song Dynasty, which greatly influenced the development of historiography.