论文部分内容阅读
光阴似箭,转眼香港回归已逾十年。观乎过去十年涉及香港的重大法律事件或日关乎香港根本或重要利益者甚多,本文仅略论全国人大常委会对香港《基本法》的解释,港府根据《基本法》第23条国家安全条款进行立法的尝试,法院关于填海和旧区改造工程等的司法复核、法院关於网络侵权的判决,以及内地和香港司法和仲裁合作安排等.一、人大释法全国人大常委会解释《基本法》的权力来自于《基本法》本身,属于贯彻‘一国两制’方针的组成部分。然由于一百多年来香港一直实行的是普通法制度,如何实现在高度自治下的法院独立审判权,同时又充分体现人大常委会的立法解释权不仅是法律问题,也是政治问题,在香港社会对大陆法系的立法解释制度极度生疏时更是如此。
Time flies, an instant Hong Kong has returned to more than ten years. In the light of the large number of major legal incidents involving Hong Kong in the past 10 years or so many of the fundamental or important interests of Hong Kong, this article only discusses the interpretation of the Basic Law of the NPC by the NPC Standing Committee. According to Article 23 of the Basic Law, Articles of the Legislative Yuan, judicial review of reclamation projects and redevelopment projects in the old districts, judgments of courts on Internet infringement and cooperation arrangements on judicial and arbitration in the Mainland and Hong Kong etc. NPC Standing Committee explained that “the Basic Law ”The power comes from the“ Basic Law ”itself and is an integral part of the principle of“ one country, two systems. ” However, since Hong Kong has practiced the common law system for over one hundred years, how to realize the right of independent court jurisdiction under a high degree of autonomy while fully reflecting the legislative power of interpretation of the NPC Standing Committee is not only a legal issue but also a political issue. In Hong Kong This is even more so when the system of social interpretation of the civil law system is extremely unfamiliar.