论文部分内容阅读
关于中古史书(主要是《后汉书》《晋书》)的语料时代,目前学界多数人认为应当区分为三部分:引录当朝文献、记事、记言。引录当朝文献视为所叙述时代的语料,记事部分看作修史者所处时代的语料;至于记言,有人认为应当作说话人所处时代的语料,有人认为应当作修史者所处时代的语料。本文通过考察发现,引录当朝文献中也有修史者自己的文字,记事部分也有原始资料,记言部分两种情况都有。所以,不能简单地那样认定,而应当都作具体的考察鉴别。并认为,是否原始资料不能要求整篇整段一字未改,而应当分解到文字、词汇、语法、语音几个层面看。
In the age of the corpus of ancient history books (mainly the Later Han and Jin Book), most people in the academic circle think that it should be divided into three parts: the introduction of current documents, memorabilia, and memoirs. When the dynasty literature is regarded as the corpus of the narrative era, the memo part is regarded as the corpus of the era in which the history of the geniuses are located; as for the rhyming discourse, some people think that it should be the corpus of the times in which the speaker is located, Corpus. Through the investigation, we find that there are also original texts of the historical documents of the current dynasties when they were quoted in the literature. There are also some original materials in the notepad. There are two cases in the memoirs. Therefore, we can not simply determine that, but should be made for specific inspection identification. And that the original data can not be requested throughout the entire paragraph without change, but should be broken down to the text, vocabulary, grammar, voice several levels of view.