论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比无保护会阴接生与传统接生的产妇会阴裂伤情况。方法:选择2013年4月至2015年4月于丰顺县人民医院自然分娩产妇134例,将其随机分为两组,各67例。对照组采用传统会阴接生法,观察组采用无保护会阴接生法。对两组产妇会阴裂伤程度及疼痛程度展开比较。结果:观察组会阴裂伤程度明显轻于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组产后疼痛度评分明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在自然分娩过程中运用无保护接生有助于保护会阴完整性,缓解会阴裂伤程度,减轻产后疼痛度。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the situation of perineal laceration among unprotected perineal delivery and traditional delivery. Methods: 134 cases of spontaneous childbirth in Fengshun County People’s Hospital from April 2013 to April 2015 were randomly divided into two groups (67 cases each). The control group received traditional perineal birth and the observation group received unprotected perineal birth. The two groups of maternal genitalia laceration and degree of pain were compared. Results: The degree of perineal laceration in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P <0.05). The postoperative pain score in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: The use of unprotected delivery during spontaneous delivery helps to protect the integrity of the perineum, relieve the severity of episiotomy and reduce post-partum pain.