论文部分内容阅读
转型中国的修宪乃是以“制度性修宪”和“观念性修宪”两种方式回应市场化进程和法治化进程,但是,如此修宪可能会遭遇正当性质疑。因此,有必要寻找一个比修宪的正当性更为“可欲”的目标。转型中国新生两方面的正当性诉求:一是改革措施的正当性问题;二是现行政治秩序的正当性问题。修宪的意义即在于构建这两方面的正当性。
In its transformation, the constitutional amendment in China responds to the process of marketization and rule of law in two ways, namely, “amending the system constitutionally” and “amending the concept of the constitution.” However, such constitutional amendment may face the question of legitimacy. Therefore, it is necessary to find a more “desirable” goal than the legitimacy of constitution amendment. The legitimacy of two aspects of the reform of China’s freshmen aspirations: First, the legitimacy of reform measures; second is the legitimacy of the current political order. The significance of constitutional amendment lies in the construction of these two aspects of legitimacy.