论文部分内容阅读
《电子知识产权》1996年第9—10期刊登了一篇题为《计算机软件转让合同不备案则不能对抗第三人》(下称《第三人》)的文章,笔者觉得本案虽不复杂,但本案的审理及本文作者提出的一些观点反映了有关著作权纠纷审判中的几个基本理论和观点问题,故提出来求教于同仁。一、关于软件转让合同不备案不能对抗第三人的问题在《第三人》一文的案例中,海天公司在将其多通道调制解调器 MP1000A 软件向国家软件中心进行登记后,与方达公司签订转让合同,将该软件的使用和许可使用权转让给了方达公司。但方达公司未在合同正式签订三个月后向软件登记管理机构备案。因此,根据《计算机软件保护条例》第27条“凡已办理登记的软件,在软件权利发生转让活动
Articles 9-10 of ”Electronic Intellectual Property Rights“ published an article titled ”The third party can not be confronted by the non-filing of contract for the transfer of computer software“ (hereinafter referred to as the ”third party“) in 1996 and I do not think the case is complicated However, the trial of this case and some of the opinions put forward by the author of this article reflect several basic theoretical and opinion issues concerning the trial of copyright disputes. Therefore, it is proposed to seek advice from colleagues. First, on the software transfer contract is not filed against third parties In the case of ”third person“ article, Haitian company in its multi-channel modem MP1000A software to the National Software Center for registration, and Fangda company signed a transfer Contract, the use of the software and the right to license transferred to the Fonda company. However, Fonda did not sign the contract with the software registration authority three months after the contract was formally signed. Therefore, according to Article 27 of the ”Regulations for the Protection of Computer Software“ ”Where software has been registered, the software rights transfer activity occurs