每当收到一些基层单位抄送的安全生产总结时,不难发现这样的数据:「半年查处事故隐患××起」,「全年排除事故隐患×××起」。一家不到两千人的企业,半年查处隐患竟有200多起。闲来无聊时,查阅该厂近几年的安全生产总结,发现几乎每年查处的「隐患」都在300起左右。累加起来,四年中共查处隐患1100余起。查处这么多「隐患」,「成绩」可谓不小。冷静忖度,这类数据似乎「水份」太重。或许是文秘人员为了「行文方便」吧?好像不通过「精确」的「量化」,没有「可观」的数据,就不足以说明有关人员在安全工作中付出的劳动,所取得的成绩。毋庸置疑?不安全的隐患在任何企业都有可能存在。但是,如果一个企业的事故隐患太多,则从反面说明该企业在安全防范方面的漏洞可能不少。试想,隐患成堆,防不胜防,职 Whenever we receive a summary of the safety production copied by some grass-roots units, it is not difficult to find such data: “Half-year investigation and handling of potential accidents from XX” and “elimination of potential accidents from the year of XX”. A less than two thousand enterprises, six months as many as more than 200 hidden dangers. Boring when boring, access to the plant in recent years, production safety summary, found almost every year, “hidden dangers” were around 300. Taken together, over four years, the CCP investigated over 1,100 hidden dangers. Investigating so many “hidden problems” and “achievements” can be described as no small ones. Calmly, this kind of data seems to be “too heavy”. Perhaps the secretarial staff is “convenient for the sake of writing”. It seems that the “quantification” of “accurate” and the absence of “considerable” data are not enough to explain the achievements made by the officers in the safety work. There is no doubt that unsafe hidden dangers may exist in any business. However, if there is too much hidden danger in an enterprise, the other side may indicate that the enterprise may have many security vulnerabilities. Imagine, hidden dangers, hard to detect, post