论文部分内容阅读
在《侵权责任法》第36条实施中,最为特殊和重要的冲突是表达自由和人格权这一宪法基本权利与私权利的冲突。第36条为网络侵权责任的规定,该条对表达自由的保护是隐性的,受侵害主体无法获得救济。网络快速扩散特征使损害扩展和受害者快速回应及影响快速消除相辅相成,解决冲突时不能偏废。网络媒介综合了多种媒介的功能,冲突权利一方网络表达自由的行使难以找到其他选择和代替途径。可从制度层面、义务角度和冲突规范结构角度探究冲突形成的原因。解决冲突需要运用利益衡量的方法。解决的指导规则为保障对人格权与表达自由的平等保护。可从宏观和具体层面解决冲突。要求法律方法、伦理方法等各种途径的结合,并且重视行业自律的重要作用。
In the implementation of Article 36 of Tort Liability Act, the most special and important conflict is the conflict between the basic right and the private right of freedom of expression and personality. Article 36 provides for the liability of Internet infringement. This article implicitly protects the freedom of expression, and the subject subject to abuse can not obtain relief. The rapid spread of the network expands the damage and the rapid response of the victims and the quick elimination of the effects of the elimination of conflicts, conflict can not be neglected. The network media integrates the functions of multiple media and it is difficult to find alternative and alternative ways to exercise the freedom of expression on the part of the parties to the conflict. The reasons for the formation of conflicts can be explored from the institutional perspective, the obligations perspective and the structure of conflict norms. Conflict resolution requires the use of a measure of interest. The guiding principles to be resolved are to protect equal protection of the right to personality and freedom of expression. Conflicts can be resolved at both the macro and the concrete levels. Requires legal methods, ethical methods and other ways to combine, and pay attention to the important role of industry self-regulation.