论文部分内容阅读
在二十世纪中国文学史上 ,胡风居于一个关键性的地位 ,不论是从他的现实主义的文学理论还是从他所坚持的知识分子的精神传统来看 ,胡风文学思想与理论都直接反映着二十世纪中国文学史与文化史的主要环节。因而 ,要摆脱以政治意识形态来分辨“是非”的二元对立框架 ,不同于对胡风文学理论命题的单向的分析 ,本稿把注意力置于二十世纪中国文化结构与胡风文学观的内在关系上 ,考察胡风文学观的文学根源与文化内涵 ,整合出胡风文学思想与理论的整体性。反映本世纪文化性质的两个标志是以“抗战”与“五四”为代表 ,依着这两种文化的价值趋向的变化而决定着其对文艺性质与作用、文化主体与对象的认识 ,而且这两种文化规范包含着根本上彼此背离而冲突的性质。胡风文学观正是在这两种文化背景下产生的。因而 ,本稿把这两种文化作为胡风文学观的主要背景 ,基于对以毛泽东的文艺政策为代表的“抗战文化”的文化心理的理解 ,阐明胡风文学观所体现的两种文化的冲突与整合过程。同时 ,把胡风的现实主义真实论作为反对抗战文化所形成的文化功利主义的先验模式的一种对应 ,着眼于胡风对“态度”的理解 ,阐明他的主体“实践”的特殊涵义。这“实践”与“态度”两个概念的明晰化 ,就指出胡风现实主义的真实论置于突出主?
In the history of Chinese literature in the twentieth century, Hu Feng was in a crucial position. Whether from his realistic literary theory or the intellectual tradition he insisted on, Hu’s literary thoughts and theories directly reflected The Twentieth Century Chinese Literary History and Cultural History. Therefore, to get rid of the binary antagonistic framework of distinguishing “right and wrong” with political ideology is different from unidirectional analysis of the proposition of Hu Feng’s literary theory. This manuscript focuses on the Chinese cultural structure and Hu Feng’s literary view of the 20th century On the inner relationship, this paper examines the literary roots and cultural connotations of Hu Feng’s literary ideas and integrates the integrity of Hu Feng’s literary ideas and theories. The two signs that reflect the cultural nature of this century are represented by “Anti-Japanese War” and “May Fourth Movement” and their determination of the nature and function of literature and art, the knowledge of cultural subjects and objects in the light of changes in the values of these two cultures, Moreover, these two cultural norms contain the fundamental nature of conflict and departure from each other. Hu Feng’s view of literature is precisely produced in these two cultural backgrounds. Therefore, the draft treats these two cultures as the main background of Hu Feng’s literary view. Based on the understanding of the cultural psychology of “Anti-Japanese Culture” represented by Mao Zedong’s literary policy, this essay expounds the conflicts of the two cultures embodied in Hu Feng’s literary view With the integration process. At the same time, Hu Feng’s realistic realism as a reaction against the culture of cultural formation by the cultural utilitarianism a priori model of correspondence, focusing on Hu Feng’s “attitude” to understand and clarify his main “practice” of the special meaning . The clarification of these two concepts of “practice” and “attitude” points out that the true theory of Hu Feng’s realism is to highlight the Lord?