类分文献究竟应不应有一个统一的基础,这是一个关键性的问题,也是这次争论的焦点之一。类分文献可以学科体系和加工程序(即深度)做依据,表现了文献的上下级关系,这是文献的纵向分类方法;也可按其功能和载体来区分,表现了文献的平级关系,这是文献的横向分类方法。如果用一种分类方法,为证明其正确而排斥另一种分类方法,是毫无意义的。正如争论杜威分类法与分面分类法哪一个正确一样。看了曾少潜同志的文章后,感到他那三大类分法的区分 There should not be a single basis for class sub-documents. This is a crucial issue and one of the focuses of this debate. Categorical documents can be based on disciplinary system and processing program (ie, depth), showing the relationship between the upper and lower levels of the literature, which is the vertical classification of the literature; can also be distinguished by its function and carrier, showing the literature of the hierarchical relationship, This is the horizontal classification of the literature. There is no point in using a classification method to exclude another classification method in order to justify it. Just as arguing that Dewey's classification is the same as that of the faceted classification. After reading the article of Comrade Zhaoshao Qian, he felt the distinction between his three major categories of law