论文部分内容阅读
运用法律解释学基本原理,考察ICSID仲裁规则第41(5)条的修订历史、目的,通过实证分析的方法,研究涉及该款规定仅有的四个裁决,提出该制度的目的在于降低当事方的成本和节约中心的资源,“法律依据”应广义理解为包括管辖权依据,该条文具有独立存在的意义,“明显”的判断基础较为灵活但认定标准较为严格,“缺乏”的认定中还可能不可避免涉及事实问题,在确保程序公正前提下应有变通做法以适应加速处理程序的时间限制。
Using the basic principles of legal hermeneutics, I examine the revision history, objective and objective of Article 41 (5) ICSID Arbitration Rules and study the only four rulings involved in this section by means of empirical analysis. I propose that the system is aimed at reducing the number of parties involved “The legal basis” should be broadly understood as including the basis of jurisdiction, which has the meaning of existence independently. The “obvious” basis of judgment is more flexible but the standard of certification is more stringent, and " Lack of recognition may also inevitably involve factual issues and should be flexible to ensure that procedural fairness is applied to the time constraints of accelerated processing.