论文部分内容阅读
波特并非第一个质疑环境管制成本主流经济观点的经济学家,但他建立并激发了20年相关研究,最终成为“波特假说”从历史上看,关注环境保护的经济学家、政策制定者和企业管理者的传统观点是,环境保护需要企业支付额外成本,这有可能削弱企业全球竞争力。根据这一传统观点,环境管制,如技术标准、环境税,或者可交易的排放配额,迫使企业将劳动力或资本的投入用来减少污染。这从业务角度来看是没有利益产出的,即使它对整个社会的
Potter is not the first economist to question mainstream economics of environmental regulation costs, but he built and inspired 20 years of relevant research that eventually became the “Porter Hypothesis.” Historically, environmental economists focused on the environment , The conventional wisdom of policymakers and business managers is that environmental protection requires businesses to pay extra costs that could undermine the global competitiveness of enterprises. According to this traditional view, environmental regulations, such as technical standards, environmental taxes, or tradable emission allowances, force companies to use labor or capital inputs to reduce pollution. This is from the business point of view there is no profit, even if it is for the entire community