论文部分内容阅读
信托财产的“占有瑕疵承继制度”在我国大陆学说中存在被误读的现象。该制度的存在以“瑕疵占有”概念的存在为前提,瑕疵占有又来源于时效取得制度。“台湾信托法”上的占有瑕疵承继制度的构成要件和法律效果均需要在文义上进行繁复的解释说明,才能阻却受托人善意取得物权,这种制度设计并非中国大陆《信托法》的最佳选择。我国现行法的相关规定有值得修改之处,但不应当直接引入占有瑕疵承继制度。
Trust property “possession of defective inheritance system ” in mainland China doctrine exists the phenomenon of being misread. The existence of the system is premised on the existence of the concept of “defective possession”, which in turn is derived from the system of prescription-based timeliness. The constitutional elements and legal effects of the possession of defective inheritance system in Taiwan’s Trust Law need to be interpreted in a complicated manner in the sense that only the trustee can be obstructed in obtaining the property rights in good faith. Such system design is not the “trust law ”The best choice. The relevant provisions of the current law in our country are worthy of revision, but should not be directly introduced into the possession of defective inheritance system.