论文部分内容阅读
美国科学发展协会为了明确“科学地读写”的含意,进行了一次向1400位包括科学家、教师、学校管理人员和分析家的调查,以得到他们对此的看法,在一次科学发展协会举办的关于科学上的读写能力的十月讨论会上公布的调查结果表明,一些人们认为的重要知识与人们所接受的知识有很大的区别。在要求回答的对15种能力的重要性的评价中,——这些能力被认为是中学毕业生应有的科学地读写的能力,83%的被调查者认为其中两项是基本的,它们是“阅读和理解报上关于科学的文章”的能力;“运用科学资料得出自己的见解”的能力。例如从臭氧的破坏和烟雾剂的使用这个问题上得出自己的看法。被列为比较重要的才能还有: (1)参加关于当代问题的具有科学见地的讨论的能力。例如:对是否允许一个艾滋病儿童到学校上课的问题进行讨论。
In order to clarify the meaning of “scientific reading and writing”, the American Association for the Advancement of Science conducted a survey of 1,400 scientists, teachers, school administrators and analysts in order to get their views on this. At a Scientific Development Association The findings released at the October Symposium on Scientific Literacy demonstrated that there is a big difference between what some people think of important knowledge and what people receive. In the evaluation of the importance of the 15 competencies that were asked to be answered - these abilities were considered to be due to the ability of secondary school students to read and write scientifically, while 83% of respondents considered two of them as essential Is the ability to “read and comprehend the newspaper articles about science” and “to use scientific materials to derive their own opinions.” Take your own opinion, for example, from the issue of the destruction of ozone and the use of aerosols. Among the more important attributes listed are: (1) the ability to participate in a science-based discussion of contemporary issues. For example: Discuss whether to allow one AIDS child to attend school.