论文部分内容阅读
查缉是缉私工作的一项基本活动。查缉后,缉私人员要根据查缉发现的证据和现场现象特征以及其它犯罪信息,对基本案情作出分析,以供缉私人员据以开展下一步侦破工作。但是,在实际工作中,往往存在这样的情况:查缉后,各缉私人员对基本案情的分析常存在差异,有时甚至出现截然不同的分析结果。随着案件侦破工作的推进,其中有的符合案件的客观实际,而有的则有偏异甚至完全错误。其原因何在呢?这主要是由于缉
Investigation is a basic activity in anti-smuggling work. After investigation, the anti-smuggling officers should analyze the basic case based on the evidence and on-site phenomena and other criminal information found in the investigation, so that the anti-smuggling officers can carry out the next step of detection work. However, in actual work, it is often the case that after the arrest, the anti-smuggling officers often have different analyzes of the basic merits and sometimes even have quite different results. With the progress of case detection, some of them are in line with the objective reality of the case, while others are biased or even completely wrong. The reason why? This is mainly due to arrest