论文部分内容阅读
艺术家与批评家往往是一对冤家。个中因由似很复杂,说来也简单:艺术家的表达,或诉诸图像,或诉诸声音,而批评家则使用语言文字。不同的媒介背后,是解释世界与自我的两种不同方式;前者重直觉和灵感,后者则是思辨的、逻辑的。所以其区别是根本性的。甚至,如果我们把“艺术”的范围稍加扩大,还可以把文学也包括进来。文学的媒介——语言本身,同样有诗意与思辨两套系统。它们也常常“谈不拢”。难怪俗语说:“没有一座城市会为一个批评家立像。”而
Artists and critics are often a pair of friends. The reasons for being complicated are, to be fair, simple: the expression of the artist, or resorting to images, or resorting to voice, while the critics use the language. Behind different media are two different ways of explaining the world and the ego; the former emphasizes intuition and inspiration, while the latter is speculative and logical. So the difference is fundamental. Even if we expand the scope of “art ” slightly, we can also include literature. Literary media - the language itself, the same poetic and speculative two systems. They also often fail to agree. No wonder the saying goes: “There is not a single city that will stand for a critic.”