论文部分内容阅读
目的 :探讨高原低氧条件下药物对人体劳动能力的改善作用 ,为提高抗低氧药物筛选提供可靠依据 ;方法 :对服用三普红景天组 (A)、乙酰唑胺组 (B)、NO吸入组 (C)和对照组 (D) ,每组 1 0人 ,于服药前运动前、服药后运动后重复检测血氧饱和度 (SaO2 )和心率 (HR) ,进行组间及服药前后的对比观察 ;结果 :A组与B组SaO2 服药后较服药前差异非常显著 (P <0 .0 1或P <0 .0 0 1 ) ,C组无显著差异 (P >0 .0 5) ,与对照组相比 ,A组差异非常显著 (P <0 .0 1或P <0 .0 0 1 ) ,B组差异显著 (P <0 .0 5) ,C组无显著差异 (P >0 .0 5) ;A组与B组服药后运动后较服药后运动前差异显著 (P <0 .0 5) ;与对照组相比 ,A组差异非常显著 (P <0 .0 1或P <0 .0 0 1 ) ,B组差异显著 (P <0 .0 5) ,C组无显著差异 (P >0 .0 5) ;A组心率服药后较服药前差异显著 (P <0 .0 5) ,B组、C组无显著差异 (P >0 .0 5) ;与对照组相比 ,A组差异显著 (P <0 .0 5) ,B组和C组无显著差异 (P >0 .0 5) ;服药后运动后较服药前运动后HR ,A组与B组差异显著 (P <0 .0 5) ,C组无显著差异 (P >0 .0 5) ,与对照组相比 ,A组差异非常显著 (P <0 .0 1或P <0 .0 0 1 ) ,B组差异显著 (P <0 .0 5) ,C组无显著差异(P >0 .0 5) ;结论 :红景天和乙酰唑胺组均能有效地提高?
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of drugs on human labor ability under high altitude hypoxia, and to provide a reliable basis for screening anti-hypoxia drugs.METHODS: The effects of taking Rhizoma et Rhizoma salviae miltiorrhizae (A), acetazolamide (B) NO inhalation group (C) and control group (D), each group of 10 people before taking the medication before exercise after taking the test repeated detection of oxygen saturation (SaO2) and heart rate (HR) before and after taking the drug (P <0.01 or P <0.01). There was no significant difference between group C and group B (P> 0.05) (P <0.01 or P <0.01). There was significant difference between group B and control (P <0.05), but there was no significant difference between group C and control (P> (P <0.05). Compared with the control group, the difference between group A and group B after exercise was significant (P <0. 01 or (P <0.05), the difference was significant (P <0.05) in group B (P <0.05), but there was no significant difference in group C (P> 0.05) 0.05). There was no significant difference between group B and group C (P> 0.05). Compared with control group, group A had significant difference (P <0.05), group B There was no significant difference between group C and group C (P> 0.05), but there was no significant difference between group A and group B after exercise (P> 0.05) .0 5). Compared with the control group, the difference in group A was significant (P <0.01 or P <0.01), the difference was significant in group B (P <0.05), but there was no significant difference in group C (P> 0.05); Conclusion: Rhodiola and acetazolamide group can effectively improve?