论文部分内容阅读
苏教版十一册习作7的题目是“推荐我喜欢的一本书”。翻阅手头的作文选,我发现这些作文都是一个类型,都是写自己阅读这本书后的感受,类似于读后感。习作内容都是先介绍这本书的故事情节、人物形象,然后结合实际谈自己的感受。千篇一律,习惯于一种“合法”的思维方式,习惯于一种公认的表达方式。这样的作文不是千篇一律,便是大同小异,缺乏想象力,缺乏新意。用这种惯性思维写出的作文,不痛不痒。它们往往只停留在事物的表层,并不触及它的内涵。就像我们去逛公园,只在公园门口打转,并未走进去。公园以内的万千景象,便一概不知。这样的作文,又怎能谈得上深度呢?
Supian version of the eleventh book exercise 7 title is “recommend a book I like ”. Read through the essay composition, I found that these essay is a type, are to write their own feelings after reading this book, similar to the sense of reading. The content of the work is to introduce the story of the book first, the image of characters, and then talk about their own feelings with reality. Thousands are stereotyped, accustomed to a “legal ” way of thinking, accustomed to a recognized way of expression. Such compositions are not stereotyped, they are similarities and differences, lack of imagination, lack of new ideas. Written with this inertial thinking composition, insurmountable. They tend to only stay on the surface of things, do not touch its meaning. Like we go to the park, only spinning in the park entrance, did not go in. Park thousands of scenes, they do not know. Such an essay, how can we talk about the depth?