论文部分内容阅读
目的观察研究不同剖宫产术式对再次剖宫产的影响。方法收集我院180例待分娩患者,患者分娩方式均为剖宫产,在手术方式中分为观察组与对照组,观察组患者采用新式剖宫产,队长组采用常规剖宫产,分娩完成后观察患者身体对再次剖宫产的影响情况。结果观察组患者开腹时间、手术时间及术中出血量等都多于对照组患者,P<0.01,差异较为明显,但是,观察组患者盆腹腔粘连度较高,对再次剖宫产的影响较高。结论不同剖宫产术式对患者再次剖宫产的具有一定的影响,新式剖宫产手术情况交常规方法具有一定的不足,但患者盆腹腔粘连较好,再次剖宫产时的影响较小,临床剖宫产分娩可选择新式剖宫产术进行。
Objective To study the effects of different cesarean sections on cesarean section. Methods 180 cases of patients to be delivered in our hospital were collected. All patients were delivered with cesarean section. The patients were divided into observation group and control group in operation mode. New cesarean section was used in observation group and routine cesarean section was used in captain group. Delivery was completed After the observation of the patient’s body again on the impact of cesarean section. Results The patients in the observation group had more laparotomy time, operation time and intraoperative blood loss than those in the control group, P <0.01, but the difference was more obvious. However, the patients with the observation group had a higher degree of pelvic adhesions and the influence on cesarean section Higher. Conclusions Different cesarean sections have some effect on cesarean section again, and the new routine cesarean section has some deficiencies. However, the pelvic adhesions are better in patients with cesarean section and less affected by cesarean section Clinical cesarean section delivery can choose new cesarean section.