人们寻求能藉以对任何艺术作品作最终评判的审美标准,就好象是在假定每一件这样的作品是一种恒定不变的实体,或者是,不管它是否有所变化.总是应当以同样的方式来评判.本文作者认为,这些假定似乎都不能成立。与之相反,作者认为艺术作品就如“美”或与之相似的事物一样,并非只有一种价值,其价值是颇具多重性的,一些人感受到作品的某些价值,另一些人则体味到另一些价值。没有一种居先的方法——除非是行政命令——能定夺众多价值中的哪一种才是在严格意义上“审美的”.这一见解通常又要遇上一种异议.因为恰巧存在着一些在“后世 The aesthetic standard by which one seeks to be able to ultimately determine any work of art is as if one assumes that each such work is an invariable entity, or whether or not it changes, In the same way, the author argues that none of these assumptions seem likely to hold. In contrast, the author believes that works of art, like “beauty” or something like them, are not just one value, but rather valuable in value, some perceive some value of the work, others appreciate To some other value. There is no prior method - unless it is an executive order - which one of many values ​​can be determined to be “aesthetically” in the strict sense of the word. Some in the "future generations