关于“农民红学家”一事,起初许多报刊的报道,随意拔高,出现了“客里空”的毛病;后来有两家报纸分别发表文章反“客里空”,却又不够实事求是。这些报道和文章,都不同程度地在读者中造成了不良影响,也损伤了被宣传者。这个报道事件,突出反映了新闻工作中存在的报道失实问题。报道失实的错误屡反屡犯,已使一些同志视为“顽症”,难道我们还能安之若素吗? As for the issue of “farmer-turned-lean scientist,” at first many newspapers and magazines were reported as free as ever. There was a problem of “customer service being empty.” Later, two newspapers published separate articles on “customer satisfaction,” but they did not seek truth from facts. These reports and articles, to varying degrees, have had an adverse effect on the readers and have hurt the propagandists. This incident highlights the misrepresentation of the existence of journalism. Repeatedly repeated mistakes in reporting false reports of inaccuracies have made some comrades “chronic diseases,” are we still safe?